Nvidia: Range without breakout — boxed in $179–$185, watching for the first crack.
China’s AI fever — Cambricon is still vertical, STAR 50 is still overheated, mania mode is engaged.
Gold: CTAs reloading — $10bn of flow lining up, volatility the joker card.
Euro: Chasing at 1.1600 — France flare fades, hunting entries above old patience point.
Markets at times resemble a train station more than a battlefield — some locomotives idling, some overheating, others quietly switching tracks before the crowd notices. Nvidia, for instance, looks like a sleek engine that has pulled into a siding. The range between $179 and $185 is less a cage and more a resting platform, with the 50-day moving average acting like the guardrail keeping it from rolling backward. This isn’t exhaustion as much as recalibration; the crew is catching its breath before deciding whether the next run is uphill or downhill.
Meanwhile, China is hosting a carnival that makes even Wall Street manias look tame. Cambricon’s trajectory from CNY600 to nearly CNY1,600 is the stuff of parables — a rocket ship blasting through the upper atmosphere with “overbought” stamped on the fuselage. But in speculative China, overbought isn’t a warning, it’s a badge of honor. Traders there don’t debate whether the candle burns too hot; they lean closer to feel the heat. The STAR 50 index just erupted 7% overnight, its RSI straining against technical boundaries like an orchestra playing louder than the score permits. But when the music is this intoxicating, nobody dares ask the conductor to quiet down.
Leverage, of course, is the invisible accelerant. Margin debt is the gasoline sloshing in the tank, and in China’s riskiest corners it’s poured liberally. The charts of Cambricon, STAR 50, and speculation itself all march in lockstep, reminding us that when bubbles form, they demand to be ridden, not argued with. A skilled surfer doesn’t scold the wave — he rides it until it crests, then bails with discipline. Stops aren’t just risk management here; they’re the exit doors of a burning theatre.
Back west, the AI obsession hasn’t dimmed. Allocations to the Magnificent 7 and AI baskets are again pressing toward one-year highs. It’s not quite the fever of mid-2024, but the market pulse is strong enough to suggest that asset managers remain chained to the same narrative. The six-month correlation between their gross longs and Goldman’s AI semi basket is near maximum — like two dancers locked in rhythm, each unwilling to break step. Crowded trades can run further than anyone expects, but they carry the same fragility: when the music cuts, the scramble for chairs will be ruthless.
Gold, ever the eccentric traveller, has been marching to its own beat. Speculators tried to front-run the recent fall and were left stranded as the metal climbed higher. Now, CTAs, forced by their models, are preparing to add an estimated $10 billion in notional GC futures.
It’s a mechanical bid, but the implications are real: the machines are joining hands with the discretionary crowd. Gold has held firm even as volatility collapsed, a reminder that sometimes the safe haven doesn’t need drama to shine. But imagine if volatility does pick up again — what feels like a slow grind could quickly turn into a stampede.
As for the euro, the noise out of France is a familiar tune: political sparks that flare brightly but rarely spread. Unless flames leap across borders, these dramas seldom leave a scar on the single currency. Still, the euro trades like a sailor pacing the deck, waiting for clearer skies before committing to a tack. We’ve adjusted our stance accordingly, shifting our buy-the-dip sights from 1.1500 to 1.1600, moving from patience to pursuit. It’s less about conviction and more about pragmatism — in FX, you don’t wait forever at a locked door; you chase the opportunity that opens first.
So the Weekender tape reads like a patchwork of different moods: U.S. tech pausing, Chinese tech in delirium, gold waiting for tremors, and the euro caught between political fog and technical fences. The unifying thread is speculation itself — sometimes bottled, sometimes spilling, continually reshaping the map. Traders don’t control the train schedule; they simply decide which carriage to board and when to disembark.
Được in lại từ FXStreet, bản quyền được giữ lại bởi tác giả gốc.
Tuyên bố miễn trừ trách nhiệm: Quan điểm được trình bày hoàn toàn là của tác giả và không đại diện cho quan điểm chính thức của Followme. Followme không chịu trách nhiệm về tính chính xác, đầy đủ hoặc độ tin cậy của thông tin được cung cấp và không chịu trách nhiệm cho bất kỳ hành động nào được thực hiện dựa trên nội dung, trừ khi được nêu rõ bằng văn bản.
Tải thất bại ()